細節
日野之彥
祈禱
油彩 畫布
2006年作
簽名︰日野之彥
來源︰
亞洲 私人收藏
展覽︰
2007年7月2日-14日 「日野之彥近作展」Galleria Grafica 東京 日本

當我們在觀看《祈禱》(Lot 503) 時,常會被日野之彥筆下那茫然失措的人物神情及主角剎那間在如顯微鏡下被高度放大般所震撼。主角誇張失焦的眼神、緊繃蜷曲的身軀,反映出日本人在面對科技資訊爆炸的社會時,對於脫離群體的不安與恐懼。科技化的世界,帶來了不斷的驚奇與新發現。從電腦的發明到生物基因改良的可能性,人類已無法預料明日世界的變化。現代生活的壓力、科技帶來的生命延續可能性等,也已經超越了人類原始單純的認知範疇。而所謂的「現實」也在時代輪替之下,不斷快速地顛覆與更新我們所了解的範圍。透過日野之彥的作品,我們看到了人們在面對如此競爭快速的社會下的不知所措與期待。

畫中人身軀如雕像般平滑,潤澤的肌膚搭配充滿活力的肌肉線條,與光滑平板的藍色背景形成強烈對比。孩童般削瘦突起的肋骨與微圓的小腹呈現異於常人的身材比例,令人感受到孩童忸怩的姿態,在面臨社會誘惑時是如此地安然自得,完全沒有意識到自身軀體的成長。畫者以奇妙的手法結合多重意涵,將賞畫人帶入幻像、現實、想像交錯的世界。注視著畫中靜止軀體呈現熟悉但又不曾親眼目睹的古代姿態,總令人不自覺感受到主題人物那深刻而似曾相似的情感與失落。日野之彥將所有心神投注於創作畫作中央的主題人物,並透過單調甚至幾近缺乏存在感的背景,進一步突顯畫布以外的整個大環境。

日野之彥筆下人物的表情令他們有如驚惶的野獸般原始,反映了個人在科技急速向前的社會中的孤立性,也引導賞畫者欣賞如古希臘羅馬雕像般的軀體,回到崇尚裸體之美的久遠年代。畫中兩位外貌幾乎完全相同的男子從容地站立,其神態與古希臘雅典紅繪花瓶上的人物十分相似,而當時人體特徵的描繪常帶有一絲女性的柔美 (圖1)。微微前傾的雙腿及纖細的身材也與古希臘少年立像 (圖2,約西元前500年創作) 同樣散發著年輕活力以及少年靜中帶動的能量。單足向前一腳在後,雙手置於身側,獨立式的希臘少年立像在當時主要是作為祈求儀式中的貢獻物品,與《祈禱》中雙手合十的裸體男子彼此呼應。日野之彥雖然身為當代畫家,卻以仿古風格描繪毫無防衛的裸體人物,透過巧妙而隱蔽的手法評論社會在潛意識中如何渴望最為簡樸的生存方式,或爆炸的科技如何置人於無盡的危險之中。《祈禱》畫中人物究竟站了多久我們無法得知,但那早已僵固的肢體顯然已無力脫離此一狀態。

日野之彥以《祈禱》為主題,探索東西方宗教以及各種信仰的人們祈禱或尋求啟示時常用的姿勢,不論是為了祈求回應或強化自身信念;信徒們也會祈求神明顯現為他消災解厄。因此畫中人物雖然帶著歡欣與些許的幽默,但整體仍透露出淡淡的神性與哲思。《祈禱》引領著每一名賞畫者超越軀殼進行探索,以解讀古代經文或象形文字的研究精神對我們的行動提出批判與預警。日野之彥融合了古典寫實畫法與主觀的軀體架構,以其扎實的技巧,對日本科技發展與個體身份及文化自覺之間的關係,提出了深刻的詰問。
來源
Private Collection, Asia
展覽
Tokyo, Japan, Galleria Grafica, Korehiko Hino Recent Works, 2-14 July, 2007.

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

In Pray (Lot 503) we are instantaneously struck by the stunned states of Korehiko Hino's subjects; their bewildered eyes and tensely bent poses reflect the claustrophobic anxiety of Japanese society's explosion of technology and information. The constant bombardment of surprising discoveries from computers and cellphones to genetic manipulation, suggest that it is impossible for man to catch up with the present, much less to predict the future. The enormous daily pressures of modern life and the possibility of extending life through science have taken us beyond our once unsophisticated understanding and appreciation of life and profoundly shaken the very foundation of our definition of "reality". Through Hino's painting, viewers absorb the confounded emotion and feel blinded by the intense competitions, rapid developments, and boundless possibilities of the future.

The smooth statuesque bodies with skin of creamy and lively flesh tones starkly contrast the reflectively flat blue background. Their bodies, although proportional, show slight disfiguration with the jagged protruding ribs and rounded bellies; an awkwardness one finds in budding children, who transfixed on social beckoning and cool, are entirely unaware of their physical growth. This strange amalgamation of messages effectively flanks the viewer between illusion, imagination and reality. While transfixed upon the still bodies in arrangements recognizable from ancient historical texts and images that we have never witnessed, we are likewise confronted with a profoundly and personally recognizable emotion and sense of loss depicted. In composition, Hino devotes his concentration to the central figures and their gestures, and further emphasizes through its simplistic and seemingly non-existent milieu, a greater context beyond the four sides of this canvas.

Each expression of Hino's subjects renders them primitive like bewildered animals, perhaps a sign of further isolation from society as one speeds through a technological revolution and reverts to simpler ancient times where nudity was accepted and considered beautiful, as rendered in ancient Greek and Roman antiquities. Stoically standing, the two near identical men resemble depictions of attic red vases of ancient Greece, where physical features were depicted with a feminine elegance (fig 1). Likewise, the softly tilted legs and slender figures reflect a youthful vigor and pre-adolescence similar to the Kouros sculptures of Archaic Greece (of approximately 500 B.C., fig 2). Standing with one leg forward, one behind and the two arms flanking the side, freestanding kouros sculpture was used as a votive offering, a notion reflected by the exposed, bare figurines of Pray. Depicting them in this unclothed and susceptible state of ancient references, Hino despite being a contemporary artist, adeptly yet subtly comments on how society either subconsciously wishes to subsist with mere bare necessities or how the dense saturation of technology renders it vulnerable to attack from all sides. It is unclear as to how long the two figures in Pray may have been standing at such assiduous attention, but in their frozen state, they seem incapable to come undone.

Through the title, Hino references the traditional gesture of prayer used by pagans, Western and Eastern religions in instances of enlightenments, pleading or restoration of faith; a believer also prays for the gods to take control and remedy a situation. This deeply spiritual and philosophical aura cannot escape the painting despite its playful and slightly humorous portrayal. In the manner one reads ancient scriptures and interprets pictographs, Pray lures the viewer's attention, inviting each and every viewer to probe beyond the mere physical, to be critical and wary of his or her actions. Straddling a classical realist depiction and the subject's own subjective fabrications Hino's distinctive painting technique allows him to pose deep questions about personal identity and cultural awareness with concerns to technological innovations within Japan.

更多來自 亞洲當代藝術 <BR>及 中國二十世紀藝術

查看全部
查看全部